Posted by: conservativecritic | April 13, 2012

Finally, the Smoking Gun Which Exposes the Global Warming Hoax!!

There have been many attempts to determine the validity of the ongoing Global Warming scares being perpetuated by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC), Al Gore, various fear-mongering US government agencies and  individuals(including President Obama) as well as a few hair-brained NASA engineers who thrive on continued grants from the US government to continue the hoax.

Finally, there appears to be a true smoking gun which exposes where and how this master stroke of planned global socialism, distribution of wealth and industrial regression into the Dark Ages was hatched.

The story starts in the United Nations – home of any number of insidious programs intended to “normalize” global wealth and natural resources and to look the other way when individuals like Saddam Hussein were involved in the oil for food scandal.  To diverge for a moment – the “Oil for Food” program began as a U.N. humanitarian aid program  but ended up with Saddam Hussein pocketing billions to become the biggest graft-generating machine ever and enriching some of America’s most forceful opponents at the United Nations.

Plus, some evidence suggests that some of the money ended up in the hands of potential terrorists who are opposed to the United States. This, all under the watchful(and guiding) eye of the United Nations.

When all of the smoke and mirrors of the UN established IPCC is taken away, the foundational reason for the IPCC was the UN’s plan to establish a method by which a select panel of scientists could be assembled to clearly demonstrate that the earth was warming and it was warming due to man’s activities(anthropological).  The plan was then to set up a “cap and trade” mechanisms whereby the wealth of first world countries could be transferred to “developing” countries in an attempt to reduce the expected global warming effect. (Sound familiar?)

The IPCC was NOT established as a clearing house(as many believe) for information on  both sides of the global warming issue. Its sole reason for survival would be the unmitigated result that the earth is warming and that warming is caused by man-made activities including the use of fossil fuels for energy around the world.

Well, everything went fine for a while – with the eminent panel of scientists carefully assembling and  collating information which would then be presented as the UN study result on global warming.

Then, things went terribly wrong.  The final scientific information(Chapter 8) was  prepared for a document called “Summary for Policy Makers” and a draft for this document which had been prepared by the large group of scientists was approved by these eminent scientists in December of 1995.  However, when the printed report was issued in May of 1996, the scientific group discovered that major changes had been made “in the back room” after they, as a large group of internationally known experts on weather and climate, had signed off on the science chapter’s contents.

In the draft material, approved by hundreds of world-class scientists known for their prior work on climate, weather, etc, the following statements were made(by these scientists):

(1) “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases”.

(2) While some of the pattern-base studies discussed here have claimed detection of a significant climate change, no study to date has attributed all or part of the climate change observed to man-made causes.  Nor has any study quantified the magnitude of a greenhouse gas effect or aerosol effect in the observed data – an issue of primary relevance to policy makers”.

(3) “Any claims of positive detection of attribution of significant climate change are likely to remain controversial until uncertainties in the total natural variability of the climate system are reduced(determined)”.

(4) “While none of these studies(conducted by these hundreds of scientists in the IPCC panel) has specifically considered the attribution(cause/effect) issue, they often draw some attribution conclusions, for which there is little justification”.

(5) “When will an anthropogenic(man-made) effect on climate be identified?  It is not surprising that the best answer(we as a group of  hundreds of scientists have) is, “We do not know.””

When the printed, final report came out in May of 1966, an unequivocal statement of man-made global warming had been inserted in the report, and the above five(5) clear and unequivocal statements by the hundreds of scientists participating in the panel had been removed.

That change was made by one man, who will be identified shortly – and who essentially completely deleted and replaced the above work by the panel of scientists with the following:

(1) “There is evidence of an emerging pattern of climate response to forcing by green house gases and sulfate aerosols…from the geographical, seasonal and vertical patterns of temperature change…these results point toward a human influence”.

(2) “The body of statistical evidence in Chapter 8(the scientific summary of the study), when examined in the context of our physical understanding of the climate sytem, now points to a discernible human influence on the global climate”.

In short, one individual single-handedly reversed the “climate science” of the whole IPCC report, and with it the global warming political process.  Who was he?  Who was this man who has completely inverted the results of hundreds, if not thousands, of experts in climate and weather prediction – and who has set the world on a path of economic self destruction?

Before we identify him – it is important to remember that without this direct statement that greenhouse gases are increasing and are the cause of any perceptible temperature change; and without the specific identification that man and the use of fossil fuels is the cause…the UN IPCC would have no further function and  would be disbanded.

It is also important to remember that individuals such as Al Gore and his ill-earned Nobel Prize would not have a single foot to stand on with respect to promote global warming.

The man responsible for this flagrant reversal of scientific research is Mr. Ben Santer of the US government’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, California.

Santer gave the IPCC precisely the information it desperately needed to continue its quest to flail against developed nations and the supposed creation of greenhouse gases through combustion of naturally available fuels such as oil, gas and coal.  Without that “document”, the IPCC had no teeth with which to proceed.

The hundreds of scientists who assembled the original study and the five(5) major points listed above, revolted and left the IPCC study group and collectively and individually  have been waging an erstwhile difficult war against this “official” document and position which the United Nations now is using to destroy the industrialized society of the West and find a way to move the wealth(through the phony “cap and trade” process – engineered by Al Gore), from rich countries to poorer ones, with an intermediate stop at his new company – to drop of billions of dollars from this transfer process.


SPECIAL NOTICE – 4.15.2012:

Fifty top scientists, astronauts, and engineers who have worked for NASA are attacking the space agency’s stance that manmade carbon dioxide is responsible for global climate change.

Seven Apollo astronauts and the deputy director of the space shuttle program are among the experts — with more than 1,000 years of combined professional experience — who have signed a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden.

The letter begins:

“We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS that manmade carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data.

“With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.

“The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.”

The signees charge NASA with advocating an “extreme position” on climate change

“prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers.”

They conclude:

“At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.”


If there were a Nobel Prize that could have been given for perpetuating fraud, Al Gore’s award was simply that prize.

However, the paper trail on this hoax goes a couple of steps further.

At Lawrence Livermore Laboratories, Ben Santor had been the recipient of just about every intellectual award in the free world…so his credentials tended to override the fraud he  had committed at the IPCC.  One of Ben Santor’s closest colleagues, with whom he worked closely on a variety of global warming studies was Dr. Steven Chu, currently the Secretary of Energy in President Obama’s cabinet.

This man - Dr. Steven Chu - Secretary of Energy for President Obama - knows full well the global warming hoax perpetuated by his Livermore Laboratories associate Ben Santer

If Dr. Chu does not know what fraudulent work Santor had done at the IPCC, I will eat my hat.  Chu, when he took the position of Secretary of Energy was also a Nobel Laureat and stated(as most everyone now knows) that we had  to  increase our price for gasoline to $8 or $9 per gallon(on a par with Europe) in order to get away from the “hated oil, gas, nuclear and coal-based energy systems” that he publicly said he was not in favor of….And this is our Secretary of Energy!

Well, if Dr. Chu knows the deep dark secrets of Santor’s back room work at the IPCC, then certainly President Obama does as well…so, now you know who is complicit in this international coverup that could eventually ruin the economies of advanced nations and allow individuals such as Al Gore to step in and make billions of dollars through a domestic and/or international cap and trade agreement…a company he has already set up to grab portions of the monies that would be transferred in such an agreement.

So, the smoking gun is there – how long will it take before America and the US Congress calls these individuals to task on attempting the biggest financial and scientific heist in the history of the world?  You and others who read this blog  should get on the phone and get your senator or congressperson to open hearings on this subject…now!

For additional information, go to


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: