Posted by: conservativecritic | September 7, 2012

WHY IS PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA CARRYING AROUND A DEAD MAN’S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER?

NOTE THAT SNOPES IS IN THE TANK FOR OBAMA – AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN – AND HAS PUT TOGETHER A COCKAMANIA STORY THAT IS INTENDED TO THROW THIS ISSUE UNDER THE BUS…BEWARE, THERE ARE A LOT OF ORGANIZATIONS  WHO FEAR OBAMA’S WRATH AND THE CHICAGO MOB’S JACK BOOT RESPONSE IF THEY DO NOT KOW TOW TO THE PRESIDENT.  WHAT’S HAPPENED TO JOURNALISM AND THE CRITIQUE OF IMPORTANT NEWS STORIES?

President Obama’s Social Security number is 042-68-4425, a fact that be confirmed by most law enforcement agencies concerned with crime labs, immigration as well as insurance and tax issues.

The problem is that this Social Security number belongs to a Mr. Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the US in 1924 and was assigned SSN: 042-68-4425, receiving it around 1977.

Obama allegedly got his CT number of 042-68-4425 in March ’77, which can be proven since the person before him -4424 and after him -4429 both got theirs then.

Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut.  Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.

Obama never lived or worked in that state, therefore there is no reason for his SSN to star with the digits 942!

Now comes the best part…Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama’s grandmother, madelyn  Payne Duham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu, Hawaii courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig’s death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soeoro simply scoured the probate records until she found  someone who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and  selected Mr.  Ludwig’s Connecticut SSN for Obama.

Although many American’s don’t fully understand the “birth certificate” and “natural born” issues that have been in the headlines for several months now, there are few American’s who do not understand that if you are using someone else’s SSN it is a clear indication of fraud.

This appears to be another in the serial lies that Obama has been living ever since he came onto the American stage some years ago.

If can just say “ol well; ho hum” after reading this you get what you deserve.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. The Connecticut SS number was caused by a data entry error. SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.

    Millions of people have multiple social security numbers caused mainly by data entry errors:

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have

    http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html

    You might well ask why, if there is evidence that Obama has multiple SS numbers and that one of them came from Connecticut that NO committee in Congress wants to investigate? Why not?

    Because it is not illegal to have mistakes in your SS files, and lots of people do. And there is no evidence that this is other than a mistake, or a lot of mistakes. Republicans would be GLAD to hold a hearing to show that there was a crime involved with Obama’s SS number. But they KNOW that there is no evidence, and if they looked into their own files (I did to mine), they are likely to find multiple numbers in them.

    • We don’t know if it was a data error or an intentional process which could be attributed to a data error….the first assumption would appear to be more likely…

  2. Reblogged this on Conservative Critic's Blog.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: