Posted by: conservativecritic | October 12, 2015

The IMF Proposes Global Wealth Confiscation


As first reported by Forbes, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) dropped a bomb in its October Fiscal Monitor Report. The report paints a dire picture for high-debt nations that fail to aggressively “mobilize domestic revenue,” which is code for “aggressively tax its citizens.” It goes on to build a case for drastic measures and recommends a series of escalating income and consumption tax increases – culminating in the direct confiscation of assets.

Why is the IMF proposing this? Because global governments and central banks pumped trillions of dollars of YOUR money into the banks and stock market over the last several years, catapulting public debts to tens of TRILLIONS of dollars. But now, governments and central banks can no longer sustain these debt levels, and global wealth confiscation is their only way to maintain the Ponzi scheme. So it’s more apparent than ever, if you want to keep your savings & retirement out of the hands of desperate governments, there’s only one thing you can do.

The Wolves Are Starving for Your Money

First, here is the excerpt where the IMF clearly advocates a tax on your private savings to pay down government debt:

The sharp deterioration of the public finances in many countries has revived interest in a “capital levy”—a one-off tax on private wealth—as an exceptional measure to restore debt sustainability… The tax rates needed to bring down public debt to pre-crisis levels are sizable. Reducing debt ratios to end-2007 levels would require a tax rate of about 10 percent on households with positive net wealth.

You read that right: the IMF wants to take 10% of your private savings in addition to the taxes you’re already paying. But is that only the beginning of the proposed wealth confiscation? The report’s most chilling aspect is the clinical manner in which it discusses how all governments can work together to track and tax your savings:

Financial wealth is mobile, and so, ultimately, are people. … There may be a case for taxing different forms of wealth differently according to their mobility… Substantial progress likely requires enhanced international cooperation to make it harder for the very well-off to evade taxation by placing funds elsewhere.

As Forbes points out, there are three key points to take away from this report:

IMF economists know there are not enough rich people to fund today’s governments even if 100 percent of the assets of the 1 percent were expropriated. That means that all households with positive net wealth—everyone with retirement savings or home equity—would have their assets plundered under the IMF’s formulation.

Such a repudiation of private property will not pay off Western governments’ debts or fund budgets going forward. It will merely “restore debt sustainability,” allowing free-spending sovereigns to keep tapping the bond markets until the next crisis comes along—for which stronger measures will be required, of course.

If politicians should fail to engage in this kind of wholesale robbery, the only alternative scenario the IMF posits is government bankruptcy and hyperinflation. The IMF makes no proposes to reign in the Ponzi-scheme entitlement programs that are bankrupting us.
Forbes argues that this is where the bankruptcy of the modern entitlement state is taking us—capital controls and exit restrictions “so the proverbial four wolves and a lamb can vote on what’s for dinner.”

Posted by: conservativecritic | September 9, 2015


What if everyone acted like Kim Davis?

Kim Davis has become a symbol of resistance to same-sex marriage for two reasons.

First, she stands alone. Well, not quite alone. There are other public officials who have vowed not to give their approval to same-sex marriages, but for various reasons they have not (yet) faced legal sanctions.

Second, in the Davis case, a federal judge has unleashed the full force of judicial power in order to crush resistance to same-sex marriage. Rather than seeking a way to accommodate homosexual couples without forcing her to violate her conscience, the judge chose to make an example of her. In other, previous cases, involving proponents of same-sex marriage who refused to carry out their legal duties, the courts have taken no such draconian action. Obviously Judge Bunning saw this case as a potentially important precedent, because if Kim Davis can resist with impunity, others will be tempted to do the same.

Well, let’s explore that possibility for a few minutes. What would happen if, across the country, hundreds or even thousands of clerks joined Kim Davis and refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples? Let’s imagine that in large swaths of America, homosexual couples were not allowed legal access to marriage, despite the Supreme Court decision claiming that this is their right. We’d have a constitutional crisis on our hands, wouldn’t we?

Yes, indeed we would. And I say: Bring it on!

The crisis, in that case, would arise not from the actions (or inactions) of Kim Davis and her fellow clerks, but from the absurd and illegitimate decision of the Supreme Court. Our form of government is based on a system of checks and balances. But through the connivance of Barack Obama and the executive branch, and the negligence of the legislative branch, the judiciary is now unchecked. There is no effective limit to what five members of the Supreme Court can do, through the arbitrary extension of their own power.

If hundreds or thousands of clerks joined Kim Davis, other public officials would be forced to ask some serious questions about what they were required to do. Police officers and court bailiffs and federal marshals and prison guards might ask themselves whether it was sensible to put so many harmless people behind bars. Judges might recognize the injustice of Judge Bunning’s approach, and look for other solutions. Members of Congress might even awaken from their slumber, and impose some limitations on the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court—as the Constitution allows Congress to do.

Ultimately the power of government relies on the consent of the governed. When a branch of government leaps beyond its proper authority, as the Supreme Court did in the Obergefell decision, civil disobedience and passive resistance are natural ways by which the people withdraw their consent, and force—one hopes—a restoration of limited republican government.

Posted by: conservativecritic | August 19, 2015

Hillary says – “…so what difference does it make?”



“…a few dozen top secret, special access documents?”

“a few dead Americans in Benghazi?”

“a few million aborted children”

“Planned Parenthood selling aborted fetus parts to companies who make consumer products?


Posted by: conservativecritic | August 15, 2015

Barack Obama – the mystery man of the century

Conservative Critic's Blog


This came from a union guy in Chicago who didn’t vote for Obama. Very, very interesting perspective that I never thought of in this light. It will be interesting to see what they put in his “Presidential Library” about his early years when he is out of office.

In a country where we take notice of many, many facets of our public figures’ lives, doesn’t seem odd that there’s so little we know about our current president, Barack Obama.

For example, we know that Andrew Jackson ‘s wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery;

Abe Lincoln never went to school.

Jack Kennedy wore a back brace; Harry Truman played the piano.

As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our newsmakers, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president.

We are all aware…

View original post 906 more words

Conservative Critic's Blog





March 17, 2012 headline: Obama agency rules Pepsi’s use of aborted fetal cells in drinks OK.

Obama claims he is a Christian…yet he is a complete supporter of full term abortion –  so he has little moral reason to put a stop to this practice. Go figure…Christians need to remember this when they go to the election polls this November…

How do you folks around the world feel about this? Do you like drinking pieces and parts of dead babies in your PEPSI and other drinks listed below?  


How do you…

View original post 2,109 more words


Prager University (7/27/15) reports: “Patrick Moore explains why he helped to create Greenpeace, and why he decided to leave it. What began as a mission to improve the environment for the sake of humanity became a political movement in which humanity became the villain and hard science a non-issue.”

This short vid explains a lot…


Posted by: conservativecritic | August 1, 2015

Canada”s Top 10 List

Conservative Critic's Blog


This is Canada ‘s Top Ten List of America ‘s Stupidity.
10) Only in America … could Democrat politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event.
9) Only in America … could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20% of the federal workforce is black while only 14% of the population is black.  40% of all federal entitlements go to black Americans – 3X the rate that go to whites, 5X the rate that go to Hispanics!
8) Only in America … could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Democrat Timothy Geithner (the head of the Treasury Department) and Democrat Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means Committee), BOTH turn out to be…

View original post 288 more words

If you are not offended by gross, sexual and gutter language, click on the above link….However, be aware that you might not want children reading this link.  

Remember,  you have been warned…


And perhaps half of American’s think that this person would make a good president?




Posted by: conservativecritic | July 31, 2015

Mr Obama – it was you!!

Most of us have known this for years. It is alarming to see it all in one blog post. It is obvious why all the attacks on Christian beliefs happen constantly. Many of us tried to tell people these things but people did not listen, to the peril of our country.

Mr. President, it was you who on ABC News referenced “My Muslim Faith.”
It was you who told an Islamic dinner “I am one of you.”
It was you who gave $100 million U.S. taxpayer funds to rebuild foreign mosques.
It was you who wrote that, in the event of a conflict “I will stand with the Muslims.”
It was you who assured the Egyptian Foreign Minister that “”I am a Muslim.”
It was you who bowed in submission before the Saudi King.
It was you who sat for 20 years in a Liberation Theology Church condemning Christianity and America while professing Marxism.
It was you who exempted Muslims from penalties under Obamacare that everyone else has to pay.
It was you who purposefully omitted “endowed by our Creator” from your recitation of The Declaration of Independence.
It was you who mocked the Bible and Jesus Christ’s Sermon On the Mount while repeatedly referring to the ‘Holy Quran’.
It was you who traveled the Islamic world denigrating the United States of America.
It was you who instantly threw the support of your administration behind the building of a ‘Ground Zero Victory’ mosque overlooking the hallowed crater of the World Trade Center.
It was you who refused to attend the National Prayer Breakfast, but hastened to host an Islamic Prayer Breakfast at the White House.
It was you who ordered both Georgetown Univ. and Notre Dame to shroud all vestiges of Jesus Christ BEFORE you would agree to go there to speak but, in contrast, you have NEVER requested that the mosques you have visited to adjust their decor.
It was you who appointed anti-Christian fanatics to your Czar Corps.
It was you who appointed rabid Islamists to the Homeland Security.
It was you who said that NASA’s “foremost mission” was an outreach to Muslim communities.
It was you who, as an Illinois Senator, were the ONLY individual who would speak in favor of infanticide.
It was you who were the first President not to give a Christmas Greeting from the White House and went so far as to hang photos of Chairman Mao on the WH tree.
It was you who curtailed the military tribunals of Islamic terrorists.
It was you who refused to condemn the Ft. Hood killer as an Islamic terrorist.
It was you who refused to speak out concerning the horrific executions of women throughout the Muslim culture but yet have submitted Arizona to the UN for investigation of hypothetical human rights abuses.
It was you who, when queried in India, refused to acknowledge the true extent of radical global Jihadists and instead profusely praised Islam in a country that is 82% Hindu and the victim of numerous Islamic terrorist assaults.
It was you who funneled $900 million in U.S. taxpayer dollars to Hamas.
It was you who ordered the USPS to honor a Muslim holiday with a new commemorative stamp.
It was you who directed our UK Embassy to conduct outreach to help ’empower’ the British Muslim community.
It was you who embraced the fanatical Muslim Brotherhood in your quest to overthrow the Egyptian President, Hosni Mubarak.
It was you who funded mandatory Arabic language and culture studies in grammar schools across our country.
It is you who follows the Muslim custom of not wearing any form of jewelry during Ramadan.
It is you who departs for Hawaii over the Christmas season so as to avoid past criticism for not participating in seasonal White House religious events.
It was you who was uncharacteristically quick to join the chorus of the Muslim Brotherhood to depose Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, formerly America’s strongest ally in North Africa; buy remain muted in your non-response to the Brotherhood led slaughter of Egyptian Christians and destruction of Coptic Christian churches.
It was you who appointed, as your chief adviser, Valerie Jarrett, who is an avowed member of the Muslim Sisterhood, an off-shoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Yes, Barack Obama, it is you who is a socialist Islamist. Continuing in your quest to ‘completely transform America’.
It Was, and Is, YOU! The evidence is clear for all except for the blind, deaf and stupid.

Col. Allen West speaks his mind.

Posted by: conservativecritic | July 25, 2015

Hillary Clinton and trust…


“20 Things I trust more than Hillary Clinton ”

1. Mexican tap water
2. A porcupine with a “pet me” sign
3. Bill Clinton, with my teenage daughter
4. A fart while fighting the flu
5. An elevator ride with Ray Rice
6. Taking pills or a drink offered by Bill Cosby
7. A Bigfoot sighting
8. A Hillary Clinton war story reported by Brian Williams
9. Gas station sushi
10 Jimmy Carter, with the economy
11.A Palestinian on a motorcycle
12.Pete Carroll coaching decisions
13.Eating an apple from an orchard at Fukushima reactor #4
14. Hitching a ride from a guy in a goalie mask
15. The ingredients in a hotdog
16. Nancy Pelosi’s grip on reality
17. Black Ice
18. Jerry Sandusky as a Boy Scout leader
19. Alien abduction stories
20. Barney Frank in the shower asking you to pick up the bar of soap

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »